The Dutch Holding
Introduction
When thinking of asset or profit shifting, capital protection and tax benefits (even tax havens), the thoughts of many will jump to exotic destinations such as Seychelles, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Emirates, Cyprus or even Hong Kong. However, what if such benefits could be found in the heart of EUROPE – and at that – completely legal and with a more developed infrastructure to provide support, stability and longevity? This article will explore the legal advantages and tax benefits of The Netherlands.
In terms of holding structures, the DUTCH HOLDING (DH) regime is a very popular one. In fact, insiders regard it as the most popular one worldwide! This is caused by not one but several factors which make opening a DH company so worthwhile. At the stem of factors motivating the settlement of a DH is the simple reality that the Dutch corporate and tax laws are historically very flexible and pose less-than-normal complications. This is further supported by reasonable low cost of incorporation and annual maintenance, which is bundled with straightforward notary procedures that are easy to coordinate, completed in timely manner and generally affordable.
Aside from the aforementioned structural simplicities and benefits, the underlaying benefit of the DH is rather simple: It provides an efficient exit route for profits of the DH’s subsidiaries and can thus create a lucrative environment in terms of corporate taxation: Regardless of income bracket, despite the regular corporate income tax of 25% when exceeding profits of EUR 200,000 annually. Therefore, if executed optimally, a DH structure could boil down to an effective tax load of roughly 5%! Prominent examples of such international intelligent structures are the IP holdings of Facebook, Google, Amazon and several other corporations. Generally, a subsidiary’s taxation of profits is triggered in its country of origin, no matter if it is a direct subsidiary to a parent company or only formally via corporate structure. Hence, the shareholders may still be taxed in their own country for the income they receive from it.
However, as a part of the European Union (EU) and being a central European country, the Netherlands has conducted several (90+) tax treaties – allowing not only the DH company but also its owners to benefit from significant taxation reductions. This, although beneficial, is not the full extent of potential in this situation, as these treaties may create legal possibilities to avoid taxation in the home country.
At the center of the DH regime is the ability to receive tax free dividends and capital gains payments, while at the same time being able to deduct expenses. These aspects go to show the attractiveness of the DH company, and how it can be beneficial regardless of the regular corporate tax rate. This will be explored in further detail throughout the chapters of this article, displaying accurately in which ways a DH can be beneficial in terms of taxation operations.
Substance Requirements for the DH
Important aspects to factor in when, where and how to incorporate a company are very often present substance requirements in the concerned jurisdiction. In case of a DH, there are almost no substance requirements: The DH does not even need employees and may be serviced entirely by a trust company. Such services provide minimum substance for maintaining a DH and could for example include management services or providing a registered address. This, simply, would already cover the requirements existing for holding companies as far as substance goes.
At the core of functionality for the DH company lies the Deelnemingsvrijstelling – the so called (Dutch) Participation Exemption (DPE). This, in essence, provides tax exemption from all revenues and earnings such as dividends, capital gains or royalties arising from shares in any qualified subsidiary. In order for a DH to quality for this, one of the following conditions must be true for the (parent) DH and subsequent subsidiaries of the DH:
The assets in the DH cannot exceed 50% of passive assets, these being subject to lower tax rates. Means, the asset base of the DH always needs to be “enriched” with active assets as well.
The DH must generate a higher return on investment (ROI) compared to its profits arising from its passive asset management. This could be reached for example with consequent renting or leasing of the active assets, as well as rendering consulting services to the subsidiaries.
If these conditions are met, the DH qualifies. In order for any DH subsidiary, also then to quality for this exemption, it must meet one of the following:
Be owned by a Dutch corporate taxpayer (in this case its parent DH) in the amount of at least 5% of paid-in nominal share capital of the subsidiary in question,
If the activities of the subsidiary should qualify as “passive investment activities”, it has to be subject to a ‘normal’ profits tax of 10%,
Not be a Fiscale Beleggingsinstelling, means a “fiscal investment fund”.
Under these conditions, if met, the DH enjoys full tax exemption on capital gains, dividend and royalty payments – the corporate taxation for ‘normal’ profits remains 25% on profits exceeding EUR 200,000.
Upon reviewing this, the reason why the DH company is such an attractive solution becomes apparent. This is not to say that there is no aspect of (calculated) risk: any business has some risk, and anyone claiming there is “zero risk” is not being honest. However, with the above structure existing, risk is minimized. The DH subsidiary structure adds an extra layer of protection between you and your business activity. For example, if the DH holds more than 95% of shares of the operating subsidiary, it can be considered as fiscal unit by the tax authorities: this would mean that costs between the two are easily settled, which in turn supports your tax return.
The possible business activities of a DH company are; essentially, limitless. For instance, it may function as the regional HQ – allowing for the ability to pair activities such as collecting dividends, receiving interests and even royalties from its subsidiaries – all in one company. Extendedly, this means that it can act as a financial service company while still remaining a traditional holding firm simultaneously.
This, naturally, brings a rich multitude of benefits: most interesting aspects are surely the aforementioned capital gains or dividends on existing shares in any subsidiaries being tax exempt, given they qualify for it. However, other relevant benefits include the following:
Excellent infrastructure with a very easy access to financial markets
Virtually no substance requirements
No foreign currency exchange restrictions
Flexible corporate law
Advance tax ruling
EU tax benefits of 0% withholding tax rate on dividends,
interests and royalties
Tax treaty benefits with more than 90 countries worldwide – ensuring a beneficial tax regime in comparison to other EU countries
Low incorporation costs as well as running costs and annual maintenance
In summary, this structure presents two relevant groupings of advantages: legal ones, and tax related ones.
Legal advantages of the DH company structure involve, but are not limited to:
Improves liability situation by keeping activities and/or assets separate.
Provides flexibility with assets or activities which must be sold eventually due to a separate entity structure: capital gains are not taxed due to Dutch Participation Exemption.
Surplus cash in the subsidiary can be distributed to the DH, keeping operating companies “light weight” for liability reasons – these distributions are also not taxed due to the DPE.
Tax advantages begin with a significantly lower tax burden overall, enabling reinvestment of profits into the corporate structure – DH and subsidiaries as well. However, the true potential is dependent upon:
What is the applicable withholding tax rate of a third country towards the country of origin vs. the Netherlands?
Are dividends reinvested or repatriated to the country of origin?
The number of shares held in the DH (in percent)?
Controlled Foreign Corporation legislation – substance over form concept & substantial interest rules in country of origin?
Capital gains protection under the relevant tax treaties?
With its combination of a strong legal base, which provides attractive taxation benefits, the DH company is therefore an attractive choice especially for overseas investors, also and especially if it comes to additional asset protection and capital shifting aspects. The aforementioned network of tax treaties can be seen as playing a major role in this.
The Netherlands has over the years concluded tax treaties with more than 90 countries worldwide, extending far beyond the region of Europe purely. This in turn strengthens the tax situation for the DH in numerous ways. Therefore, as an example, a DH may avoid capital gains tax in the country of a subsidiary if the (Dutch) shareholder sells his shares. Common tax issues, like dual-residency issues, do not typically arise due to these treaties either. Other aspects for potential conflict such as permanent establishment related questions are also avoided. As mentioned previously, a reduction in withholding tax with dividend payments by the DH to the country of the investor, as well as a reduction of withholding tax rates for other sources of income such as interest or royalty payments are both present.
One aspect to note is that these treaties can be overruled by the EU directives. Especially in the case of dividends, the Parent-Subsidiary Directive provides a 0% withholding tax rate for any qualifying corporate dividends paid within the EU. This, naturally, will deviate per country depending on the implementation laws, but nonetheless provides an attractive outlook for the topic of dividends.
For this to be applicable, however, several conditions must, yet again, be met:
Shareholder is a corporation which qualifies as a tax resident of another EU or European Entrepreneurial Region (EER) member state (not Liechtenstein!).
Shareholder (corporate) would qualify for Dutch participation exemption or participation credit if it would be residing in NL.
Shareholder is not a tax-exempt portfolio investment fund, comparable to a Dutch portfolio investment fund.
Shareholder has no dual residency status with a country outside of EU/EER.
Shareholder qualifies as beneficial owner of shares.
Shareholder is not located in a state where NL has concluded a tax treaty with an anti-abuse clause, so that the shareholder would not be entitled to a reduction of the dividend withholding tax rate.
This ruling keeps its attractiveness even to non-EU resident investors: Double layer holding structures with utilization of the tax advantages in relation between DH and its subsidiaries offer a much wider variety when it comes then at the end to the dividend taxation towards the beneficial owner. Here it makes sense to pinpoint to e.g. Google’s “Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich” structures, but also updated strategies.
Separate Types of Holding Structures:
Dutch Finance Company
A frequently used and reliable tax planning structure is the so-called DUTCH FINANCE COMPANY (DFC). It is enabled through the excellent legal and financial infrastructure which the Netherlands provides. A specific attribute towards further amplifying the ability for a DFC can be made to the 2010 ruling for “flow through financing”, which made the DFC an attractive solution. For this to apply, the DFC must possess an own office and own bank account. Further, the equity at risk must be at least 1% of any outstanding loans or exceed EUR 2 Million if it is less than 1%. The DFC is very compatible with foreign tax regimes and resistant to anti-abuse provisions of foreign countries under this ruling. In terms of group financing activities, this particular ruling places the Netherlands at the frontline of the EU – while there is no true “special tax rate”, and the normal income tax for corporations applies, this new ruling provides an effective tax rate of just 5%!
The main type of DFC since the 2010 ruling is the Dutch Group Finance Company (DGFC). A primary activity of the DGFC is to provide loans to subsidiaries, shareholders and group companies. However, it may also function as a holding or even operating firm. In this structure, effectively 75-80% of the net interest income is excluded from the taxation base. This, as mentioned above, helps reduce the tax rate to 5% de facto! The benefits are therefore apparent. To nonetheless name a few, here is a list of highlights:
A very competitively low corporate income tax
No (or very little) foreign withholding taxes on interest due to the aforementioned Tax treaties & EU Directives
No tax haven status for application of foreign anti-abuse provisions
No tax haven status for anti-tax haven measures in the US
In some cases, tax exemption for foreign branch profits
Naturally, a DFC / DGFC must comply with Dutch tax filing and registration requirements – there is, therefore, increased scrutiny from authorities towards DFCs or other “tax vehicles”. A DFC must register for tax purposes, compose an annual corporate income tax return, obtain tax residency status (if required), manage VAT returns (if required), manage dividend withholding tax returns (if required). Nonetheless, in combination, these aspects make the DFC a lucrative and viable option for foreign investors.
Separate Types of Holding Structures:
Dutch Cooperative
A further relevant and lucrative type of DH structure is the DUTCH COOPERATIVE (DC), or DUTCH COOP. It is an acknowledged form of parent-subsidiary structure which can receive dividends from EU subsidiaries without incurring dividend withholding tax in the origin country of the subsidiary. This makes it a popular international structure choice for no-tax holding companies. The DC, while being subject to Dutch corporate income tax may be eligible for DPE. The DC uses ‘members’ instead of ‘shareholders’. A DC must have at least two members at time of incorporation and is designed to benefit its members via its activities such as holding or other holding structure related activities. For example, similar to the two main company types in the Netherlands, the B.V. and N.V. type companies, liability is limited. In this, members can be compared to shareholders, in that they can be entitled to profits of the DC, but do not have capital dividend in shares, so there is no minimum capital – or even equity – requirement. The incorporation is performed via notary deed, however there is no minimum capital requirement for the incorporation and a bank statement is not required. It must, however, be differentiated between the UA (excluded liability) or the BA (limited liability) – even by name.
Taxation of the DC happens the same way as with all Dutch corporations on surface level: It is subject to corporate income tax. However, as long as the interest can be allocated to an active business of any member in the DC, there is no dividend withholding tax (otherwise it is 15%). It is to note, that this 15% applies if the DC in/directly holds shares in a company with the main purpose to avoid Dutch dividend withholding tax or foreign tax only. Any dividends received or capital gains on shares in qualifying subsidiaries are effectively tax exempt.
On the layer of members of a DC, it is to note that foreign based members may be subjected to Dutch corporate or even individual income tax if there is income derived from the membership in the DC, as long as this cannot be allocated to the equity of a business enterprise according to the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act. This is the case when a non-resident taxpayer owns in/directly at least 5% of the interest or voting power of the Dutch entity.
The DC may qualify as a company eligible for tax treaty benefits. However, it is not a standard legal form and may thus be scrutinized by tax authorities in the source state and therefore deny treaty benefits. To avoid this, a B.V. company may be involved as an intermediary between the DC and the foreign company making payments. This behaves similar for EU withholding tax exemptions for dividends, interest and royalties.
The DC is, although not a standard and go-to legal form of holding an extravagant possibility for a foreign investor.
Concluding Remarks
The Dutch Holding allows foreign investors a flexible and reliable way to optimize their operating structures. Enabled and enhanced by the excellent infrastructure and legal framework the Netherlands has to offer, it provides a solution to an issue that can typically only be taken care of in exotic (and at times questionable) tax havens.
Situated at the heart of Europe, it combines the use of several (90+) tax treaties with the further attribute to not be classified a traditional tax haven, allowing for prime features such as tax-free dividends and capital gains. Remaining at all times in the legal “green zone”, the Dutch Holding presents itself in our view as not one, but the choice for foreign offshore investors.
Publication
Phillip’s abstract has been published in:
China Offshore: Asset Protection Guide - Trusts, Foundations, Identity Planning (10th Edition), pages 34 to 43